Historians and archaeologists are sometimes compared with detectives because

Historians are scholars who study and interpret past events, societies, and cultures through the analysis of written records, documents, and other historical sources. 

• Archaeologists are scientists who study past human cultures and civilizations through the excavation and analysis of material remains, such as artifacts, structures, and bones. 

Key Points 

• Historians and archaeologists are often compared to detectives because they carefully gather and analyze clues from various sources such as artifacts, documents, and other remnants of the past to piece together historical events and understand ancient cultures.
• Just like detectives, they investigate, form hypotheses, and draw conclusions based on the evidence they uncover.

Hint

• They write about the secret missions that took place in the past is incorrect because historians and archaeologists focus on a wide range of events, not just secret missions.
• They serve as secret agents for tracing treasures of the past is incorrect as their primary role is not treasure hunting but understanding historical contexts.
• They disguise themselves as detectives is incorrect because historians and archaeologists do not literally disguise themselves; the comparison is metaphorical.

Thus, historians and archaeologists are sometimes compared with detectives because they take clues from various sources while investigating about the past.