Match the following :

List - I		List- II
A.	Kesavananda Bharati	1.	Free and fair elections
B.	Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs Raj Narain	2.	Right to property
C.	L. Chandrakumar Vs UOI	3.	Emergency powers
D.	S.R. Bommai	4.	Tribunals

Choose the correct pairs/answer : 

Key Points

• The Kesavananda Bharati case (A) established the doctrine of the basic structure of the Constitution which includes the Right to Property. Hence, A - 2.
• In the Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Raj Narain case (B), the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of free and fair elections. Hence, B - 1.
• The L. Chandrakumar vs Union of India case (C) dealt with the jurisdiction of Tribunals. Hence, C - 4.
• The S.R. Bommai case (D) was significant in laying down the criteria for the use of emergency powers under Article 356 of the Indian Constitution. Hence, D - 3.

Additional Information

• Kesavananda Bharati Case:
  • This landmark judgment in 1973 is known for the doctrine of the basic structure of the Constitution.
  • The Supreme Court ruled that while Parliament has wide powers, it cannot alter the basic structure of the Constitution.
  • The case was primarily about the extent of Parliament's power to amend the Constitution.
  • This case is significant in the context of judicial review and the protection of fundamental rights.
• Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Raj Narain:
  • This 1975 case resulted in the invalidation of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's election by the Allahabad High Court.
  • The Supreme Court upheld the principle of free and fair elections as a basic structure of the Constitution.
  • The case highlighted the importance of electoral integrity and judicial independence.
  • It is a significant case in the context of election laws and democratic processes in India.
• L. Chandrakumar vs Union of India:
  • This 1997 case dealt with the jurisdiction of Tribunals under Articles 323A and 323B of the Constitution.
  • The Supreme Court ruled that the power of judicial review over legislative actions is a part of the basic structure of the Constitution.
  • The decision emphasized that tribunals are supplementary to the High Courts and cannot completely replace them.
  • This case is important for understanding the role and limitations of administrative tribunals in India.
• S.R. Bommai Case:
  • This 1994 case dealt with the imposition of President's Rule under Article 356 of the Constitution.
  • The Supreme Court laid down guidelines for the use of emergency powers, emphasizing that they should not be misused for political purposes.
  • The judgment strengthened the principles of federalism and democracy in India.
  • This case is significant for its impact on the balance of power between the State and Central governments.